From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ortiz v. Winter

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 9, 2007
CASE NO. 1:06-CV-01611-OWW-TAG (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:06-CV-01611-OWW-TAG.

August 9, 2007

ROGER NUTTALL, ESQ. #42500 NUTTALL COLEMAN FRESNO CA, Attorneys for Plaintiff HOPE ORTIZ.


STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING THE HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANT DONALD W. WINTER'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT


IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the parties in the above-entitled action, through their respective counsel of record, that (1) the hearing on Defendant Donald W. Winter's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint be continued to October 22, 2007 at 10:00 a.m.; (2) Plaintiff's opposition is to be filed and served on or before October 5, 2007; and (3) Defendant's reply brief is to be filed and served pursuant to the statutory time.

Good cause exists for continuing the hearing date. Counsel for Plaintiff was under the erroneous belief that Randall M. Penner, had been associated as counsel and was preparing the opposition. It was only after counsel was notified by the Court that no opposition had been filed, the error was discovered.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED that (1) the hearing on Defendant Donald W. Winter's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint be continued to October 22, 2007 at 10:00 a.m.; plaintiff's opposition is to be filed and served on or before October 5, 2007; and (3) defendant's reply brief is to be filed and served on or before the statutory time.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ortiz v. Winter

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 9, 2007
CASE NO. 1:06-CV-01611-OWW-TAG (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2007)
Case details for

Ortiz v. Winter

Case Details

Full title:HOPE ORTIZ, Plaintiff, v. DONALD C. WINTER, SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 9, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. 1:06-CV-01611-OWW-TAG (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2007)