From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ortiz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 13, 2002
807 So. 2d 755 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 4D01-3393

Opinion filed February 13, 2002.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Marvin U. Mounts, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 97-13009 CFA02.

Jose Enrique Oritz, Miami, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P. Hyndman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We reverse the summary denial of Appellant's rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief as to one of its multiple claims.

Appellant asserts in ground four that counsel was ineffective for failing to object to a departure sentence entered without written reasons. The order does not include or attach portions of the record conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to relief.

Appellant's allegation that his attorney was ineffective, for failing to object to a departure sentence not accompanied by written reasons, is legally sufficient. See Moore v. State, 747 So.2d 427 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

Therefore, as to this ground, we reverse with direction to the trial court to either attach portions of the record refuting Appellant's claim or to hold an evidentiary hearing. In all other respects, the order is affirmed.

POLEN, C.J., STONE and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ortiz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 13, 2002
807 So. 2d 755 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Ortiz v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOSE ENRIQUE ORTIZ, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 13, 2002

Citations

807 So. 2d 755 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)