From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ortiz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 25, 2006
932 So. 2d 214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 3D04-78.

December 15, 2004. Rehearing Denied July 25, 2006.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Richard V. Margolis, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Valerie Jonas, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Lucretia A. Pitts, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and SHEPHERD, JJ.


We affirm the trial court's Order revoking Defendant's probation. Moreover, contrary to Appellant's suggestion that probation was not violated where he submitted to TASC evaluation despite the admission that he was discharged from the program for missing two consecutive appointments, we hold that when a court Orders anyone to submit to a program, it is inherent within the Order that the Defendant "successfully complete" the program. Appellant's remaining points are without merit and/or moot in light of our holding.


Summaries of

Ortiz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 25, 2006
932 So. 2d 214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Ortiz v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ever Nahon ORTIZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 25, 2006

Citations

932 So. 2d 214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)