Opinion
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00236-RPM
01-27-2012
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
ORDER FOR AMENDMENT TO SCHEDULING ORDER
On January 19, 2012, the plaintiff filed a Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. The defendants filed their response on January 20, 2012, and on January 23, 2012, an order entered requiring the plaintiff to clarify the motion to specify what discovery was to be done beyond the discovery date of February 1, 2012. On January 25, 2012, the plaintiff filed a clarified motion indicating that the plaintiff seeks to take four depositions and time to respond to the plaintiff's discovery requests to defendants served on January 20, 2012. In the defendants' response of January 20, 2012, there was no objection to the extension to March 1, 2012, to complete depositions but did oppose the written discovery. The plaintiff has failed to show good cause for the delay in submitting written discovery. It is now
ORDERED that the plaintiff's motion is granted for the limited purpose of taking the depositions identified in the clarified motion to be completed before March 9, 2012, and the motion is denied with respect to written discovery served January 20, 2012. The deadline for filing dispositive motions is extended to and including April 1, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
________________________
Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge