From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ortiz v. M.J. Peterson Marina Homes Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 29, 1993
199 A.D.2d 1059 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

December 29, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Francis, J.

Present — Pine, J.P., Balio, Lawton, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court, Francis, J., except insofar as the court found questions of fact concerning proximate cause. Defendants failed to address that issue in response to plaintiffs' cross appeal and, in any event, we conclude that the Labor Law § 240 violation was a proximate cause of the fall of plaintiffs' decedent. Supreme Court properly denied the cross motion of plaintiffs for partial summary judgment on their Labor Law § 240 cause of action, however, because there are questions of fact whether it is barred by the Workers' Compensation Law.


Summaries of

Ortiz v. M.J. Peterson Marina Homes Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 29, 1993
199 A.D.2d 1059 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Ortiz v. M.J. Peterson Marina Homes Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JUDITH ORTIZ et al., as Personal Representatives of the Estate of DEREK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 29, 1993

Citations

199 A.D.2d 1059 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
608 N.Y.S.2d 909

Citing Cases

Chart v. Mark IV Construction Co.

That part of the cross motion seeking summary judgment based on the workers' compensation defense was…