From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ortiz v. Lynch

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 11, 2022
2:22-cv-00019-AGP-EJY (D. Nev. Oct. 11, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00019-AGP-EJY

10-11-2022

IGNACIO GONZALES ORTIZ, an individual; and ADELINA CHAPARRO, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. DAVID JOHN LYNCH, an individual; SYSTEM TRANSPORT, INC, a foreign corporation; DOE INDIVIDUALS I through X; and ROE ENTITIES I through X, Inclusive, Defendants.

TIMOTHY A. MOTT, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12828 JAMES A. TRUMMELL, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 14127 NICOLE C. BOLICK, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 15015 VALIENTE MOTT, LTD. Attorneys for Plaintiffs MORGAN PETRELLI, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 13221 JACEY PRUPAS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9156 Attorneys for Defendants


TIMOTHY A. MOTT, ESQ.

Nevada Bar No. 12828

JAMES A. TRUMMELL, ESQ.

Nevada Bar No. 14127

NICOLE C. BOLICK, ESQ.

Nevada Bar No. 15015

VALIENTE MOTT, LTD.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

MORGAN PETRELLI, ESQ.

Nevada Bar No. 13221

JACEY PRUPAS, ESQ.

Nevada Bar No. 9156

Attorneys for Defendants

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES AND PROPOSED ORDER

(FIRST REQUEST)

Pursuant to LR 6-1 and LR 26-4, the parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and request that this Court extend discovery in the above-captioned case ninety (90) days. In addition, the parties request that all other future deadlines contemplated by the Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order be extended pursuant to Local Rule. In support of this Stipulation and Request, the parties state as follows:

1. On December 8, 2021, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial in the Fifth Judicial District Court, under Case No. CV21-0743.

2. On January 4, 2022, Defendants filed their Petition for Removal from Fifth Judicial Court and this Court approved on February 2, 2022.

3. On January 10, 2022, Defendants filed their Answer to the Plaintiffs' Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial.

4. On February 7, 2022, the parties conducted a 26(f) conference.

5. Plaintiffs served their Initial and Supplemental Document and Witness Disclosures.

6. Defendants served their Initial and Supplemental Document and Witness Disclosures.

7. Plaintiffs served their First Set of Interrogatories, Requests for Production and Requests for Admissions to Defendant JOHN DAVID LYNCH on May 24, 2022.

8. Defendant SYSTEM TRANSPORT INC. served their First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents to Plaintiff IGNACIO GONZALEZ ORTIZ on April 4, 2022.

9. Defendants have subpoenaed Plaintiffs' medical providers.

DISCOVERY REMAINING

The parties will continue participating in written discovery. The following discovery remains to be completed:

1. Defendants will take the deposition of Plaintiff IGNACIO GONZALES ORTIZ on October 26, 2022.

2. Defendants will take the deposition of Plaintiff ADELINA CHAPARRO, tentatively scheduled for November 7, 2022.

3. Plaintiffs will take the deposition of Defendant DAVID JOHN LYNCH, currently being coordinated.

4. Plaintiff will take the deposition of Defendant SYSTEM TRANSPORT INC's Person Most Knowledgeable.

5. Depositions of responding officers and medical personnel.

6. Expert disclosures.

7. Depositions of expert witnesses.

The parties may take the depositions of any and all other witnesses garnered through discovery.

WHY REMAINING DISCOVERY HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED

The parties aver, pursuant to Local Rule 26-4, that good cause exists for the following requested extension. This Request for a brief extension of time is not sought for any improper purpose or other purpose of delay. Rather, it is sought by the parties solely for the purpose of allowing sufficient time to conduct additional discovery prior to the deadline for expert disclosures. Specifically, the depositions of the parties and certain fact witnesses are necessary before the parties' experts will be in a position to prepare reports. The parties seek additional time to complete discovery for several reasons, none of which are for an improper purpose or for the purpose of delay. Accordingly, and in short, the parties request an extension of the current discovery deadlines to allow the parties an opportunity to fully understand the nature of Plaintiffs' claims and Defendants' defenses thereto.

EXTENSION OR MODIFICATION OF THE DISCOVERY PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER

LR 26-4 governs modifications or extension of the Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Any stipulation or motion to extend or modify that Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order must be made no later than twenty-one (21) days before the expiration of the subject deadline and must comply fully with LR 26-4.

This is the first request for extension of time in this matter. The parties respectfully submit that the reasons set forth above constitute compelling reasons for the short extension.

The following is a list of the current discovery deadlines and the parties' proposed extended deadlines:

Scheduled Event

Current Deadline

Proposed Deadline

Discovery Cut-off

December 30, 2022

March 30, 2023

Deadline to Amend Pleadings or Add Parties

September 30, 2022

CLOSED

Expert Disclosure pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(2)

October 31, 2022

January 27, 2023

Rebuttal Expert Disclosure pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(2)

November 30, 2022

February 28, 2023

Dispositive Motions

January 30, 2023

April 28, 2023

Joint Pretrial Order

March 1, 2023

May 29, 2023

WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that this Court extend the discovery period by ninety (90) days, and the other dates as outlined in accordance with the table above.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ortiz v. Lynch

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 11, 2022
2:22-cv-00019-AGP-EJY (D. Nev. Oct. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Ortiz v. Lynch

Case Details

Full title:IGNACIO GONZALES ORTIZ, an individual; and ADELINA CHAPARRO, an…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 11, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-00019-AGP-EJY (D. Nev. Oct. 11, 2022)