From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ortiz v. Knighton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 28, 1961
14 A.D.2d 679 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Opinion

September 28, 1961


Order, entered on September 12, 1960, granting plaintiffs-respondents' motion for summary judgment and setting the cause down for assessment of damages unanimously reversed on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant, and the motion denied, with $10 costs. Plaintiff's vehicle was struck in the rear by defendant's vehicle and no issue is raised on this motion as to the course and speed of the vehicles, or the surrounding circumstances. Nevertheless, an issue of fact exists whether defendant was negligent, that is, whether what defendant concededly did was in fact a breach of the duty of due care. ( Hajder v. G. G. Moderns, 13 A.D.2d 651.) The failure of defendant to submit a personal affidavit giving an exculpating version of the accident does not eliminate the factual question of negligence (see Gerard v. Inglese, 11 A.D.2d 381, 383).

Concur — Breitel, J.P., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Noonan, JJ.


Summaries of

Ortiz v. Knighton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 28, 1961
14 A.D.2d 679 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)
Case details for

Ortiz v. Knighton

Case Details

Full title:SANTA ORTIZ et al., Respondents, v. "THOMAS" KNIGHTON, Defendant, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 28, 1961

Citations

14 A.D.2d 679 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Citing Cases

Sterne v. Diamond

A moving party must in the first instance present such evidentiary facts as will establish his cause of…

Sacramona v. Scalia

In ordinary circumstances while res ipsa loquitur makes out a prima facie case for plaintiff, that fact, in…