From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ortiz v. Kmart Corporation

United States District Court, D. Virgin Islands, Division of St. Croix
Jan 11, 2010
1:07-cv-32 (D.V.I. Jan. 11, 2010)

Opinion

1:07-cv-32.

January 11, 2010


ORDER


TO: Joel H. Holt, Esq. Wilfredo A. Geigel, Esq. Patrick D. Blake, Esq.

THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Third-Party Defendant Sunshine Shopping Center's Motion to Compel (Docket No. 53). Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff filed an opposition to said motion. This order is issued without necessity of reply.

Third-Party Defendant requests the Court to compel the depositions of Rafael Arroyo and Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff's 30(b)(6) representative for January 13 or 14, 2010. Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, in its opposition, states that counsel is available, but that counsel needs to confirm the availability of the witnesses. Since the filing of the said opposition, counsel for Third-Party Defendant has communicated to the undersigned that counsel for both parties have agreed to schedule the said depositions for January 14, 2010, at 3:00 p.m.

Being advised in the premises of the said motion and in view of the fact that the parties have come to an agreement, it is now hereby ORDERED that Third-Party Defendant's Motion to Compel (Docket No. 53) is DENIED AS MOOT.


Summaries of

Ortiz v. Kmart Corporation

United States District Court, D. Virgin Islands, Division of St. Croix
Jan 11, 2010
1:07-cv-32 (D.V.I. Jan. 11, 2010)
Case details for

Ortiz v. Kmart Corporation

Case Details

Full title:KATHY ORTIZ, Plaintiff, v. KMART CORPORATION, Defendant/Third-Party…

Court:United States District Court, D. Virgin Islands, Division of St. Croix

Date published: Jan 11, 2010

Citations

1:07-cv-32 (D.V.I. Jan. 11, 2010)