From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ortiz v. Kerestes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 6, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-460 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 6, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-460

09-06-2017

ANTONIO L. ORTIZ, Petitioner v. KERESTES, et al., Respondents


( ) ORDER

AND NOW, this 6th day of September, 2017, upon consideration of the report (Doc. 15) of Chief Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab, recommending that the court dismiss as moot the petition (Doc. 1) for writ of habeas corpus filed by petitioner Antonio L. Ortiz ("Ortiz"), in view of Ortiz's release to parole, and it appearing that no party has objected to the report, see FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2), and the court noting that failure of a party to timely object to a magistrate judge's conclusions "may result in forfeiture of de novo review at the district court level," Nara v. Frank, 488 F.3d 187, 194 (3d Cir. 2007) (citing Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878-79 (3d Cir. 1987)), but that, as a matter of good practice, a district court should "afford some level of review to dispositive legal issues raised by the report," Henderson, 812 F.2d 878; see also Taylor v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 83 F. Supp. 3d 625, 626 (M.D. Pa. 2015) (citing Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply Int'l, Inc., 702 F. Supp. 2d 465, 469 (M.D. Pa. 2010)), in order to "satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) advisory committee notes, and, following an independent review of the record, the court being in agreement with Judge Schwab's recommendation, and concluding that there is no clear error on the face of the record, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The report (Doc. 15) of Chief Magistrate Judge Schwab is ADOPTED.

2. Ortiz's petition (Doc. 1) for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED as moot.

3. The court finds no basis to issue a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); R. GOVERNING SECTION 2254 CASES R. 11(a).

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Ortiz v. Kerestes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 6, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-460 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 6, 2017)
Case details for

Ortiz v. Kerestes

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO L. ORTIZ, Petitioner v. KERESTES, et al., Respondents

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Sep 6, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-460 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 6, 2017)