From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ortiz v. Judge, 171st Judicial Dist. Court

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Aug 30, 2006
No. WR-64,959-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Aug. 30, 2006)

Opinion

No. WR-64,959-01

Delivered: August 30, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH.

On Application for a Writ of Mandamus from El Paso County.


ORDER


Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in the 171st Judicial District Court of El Paso County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the application has not yet been forwarded to this Court. Relator contends that the district court entered an order designating issues on March 18, 2004. In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. The respondent, the judge of the 171st District Court of El Paso County, is ordered to file a response with this Court by having the District Clerk submit the record on such habeas corpus application or by setting out the reasons that no findings have been made since the order designating issues was entered. This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus will be held in abeyance until the respondent has submitted the appropriate response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.


Summaries of

Ortiz v. Judge, 171st Judicial Dist. Court

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Aug 30, 2006
No. WR-64,959-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Aug. 30, 2006)
Case details for

Ortiz v. Judge, 171st Judicial Dist. Court

Case Details

Full title:ERIC ORTIZ, Relator v. JUDGE, 171ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, Respondent

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Aug 30, 2006

Citations

No. WR-64,959-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Aug. 30, 2006)