From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ortiz v. Grierson

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Apr 30, 2013
No. 58347 (Nev. Apr. 30, 2013)

Opinion

No. 58347

04-30-2013

FRANCISCO ORTIZ, Petitioner, v. STEVEN GRIERSON, DISTRICT COURT CLERK, DC CRIMINAL DESK 56, DEPUTY CLERK OF THE COURT, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

On March 14, 2013, this court entered an order to show cause why this proper person petition for a writ of mandamus should not be dismissed as abandoned as it appeared that petitioner had moved without informing this court of his new address, leaving us unable to communicate with him. The order gave petitioner until March 29, 2013, to respond and cautioned petitioner that his failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this matter. To date, petitioner has failed to respond or otherwise comply with the March 14 order and the copy of our March 14 order sent to petitioner was returned with no forwarding address. Accordingly, we conclude that petitioner has abandoned this petition, and we

ORDER this petition DISMISSED.

We direct the clerk of this court to file petitioner's May 31, 2011, motion regarding the filing fee and conclude that no action is necessary on this motion as the filing fee has since been waived.

_______________, J.

Gibbons
_______________, J.
Douglas
_______________, J.
Saitta
cc: Francisco Ortiz

Clark County District Attorney/Civil Division

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Ortiz v. Grierson

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Apr 30, 2013
No. 58347 (Nev. Apr. 30, 2013)
Case details for

Ortiz v. Grierson

Case Details

Full title:FRANCISCO ORTIZ, Petitioner, v. STEVEN GRIERSON, DISTRICT COURT CLERK, DC…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 30, 2013

Citations

No. 58347 (Nev. Apr. 30, 2013)