From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ORTIZ v. COX

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 26, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-0351 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 26, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-0351 JFM (PC).

May 26, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. On April 14, 2011, defendant filed a motion to compel plaintiff's response to requests for production of documents, set one, and verified responses to interrogatories, set one. Defendant also seeks sanctions.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff show cause within 30 days of the date of this order why defendant's motion should not be granted.

DATED: May 25, 2011.


Summaries of

ORTIZ v. COX

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 26, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-0351 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 26, 2011)
Case details for

ORTIZ v. COX

Case Details

Full title:ROMAN ORTIZ, Plaintiff, v. COX, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 26, 2011

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-0351 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 26, 2011)