From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ortiz v. Cox

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Dec 8, 1964
338 F.2d 1017 (10th Cir. 1964)

Opinion

No. 7849.

December 8, 1964.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico; Howard C. Bratton, Judge.

Jerry D. Sokolosky, Oklahoma City, Okla., for appellant.

L.D. Harris, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PICKETT and SETH, Circuit Judges.


This is a sucessive application to the New Mexico Federal Court attacking the validity of the petitioner's State sentence. The trial Court allowed the petitioner to proceed in forma pauperis and upon examining the petition and the records of the Court, particularly the record in cause No. 4046, found that this petition raised no new grounds for relief not presented and adversely decided against the petitioner in cause No. 4046, entitled Ortis v. Woodruff.

The case was brought here on probable cause, and counsel was appointed to represent the petitioner. Upon consideration of the record and oral argument of counsel, the judgment of the trial Court is affirmed.


Summaries of

Ortiz v. Cox

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Dec 8, 1964
338 F.2d 1017 (10th Cir. 1964)
Case details for

Ortiz v. Cox

Case Details

Full title:Mike ORTIZ, Appellant, v. Harold A. COX, Warden, New Mexico State…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit

Date published: Dec 8, 1964

Citations

338 F.2d 1017 (10th Cir. 1964)