From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ortiz v. Codella

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 4, 2014
123 A.D.3d 453 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-12-4

Anthony ORTIZ, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Michael CODELLA, etc., Defendant–Respondent, The City of New York, et al., Defendants.

Law Offices of Joel B. Rudin, New York (Joel B. Rudin of counsel), for appellant. Ronald P. Berman, New York, for respondent.



Law Offices of Joel B. Rudin, New York (Joel B. Rudin of counsel), for appellant. Ronald P. Berman, New York, for respondent.
, J.P., SWEENY, DeGRASSE, FEINMAN, GISCHE, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, J.), entered August 19, 2013, which granted defendant Codella's motion to change venue from Bronx County to New York County pursuant to CPLR 504(3), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for malicious prosecution and violation of his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that he was wrongfully convicted of a murder he did not commit based on serious misconduct by the individual defendants, then employed by the New York City Housing Authority and New York City Police Department. Plaintiff's conviction was vacated based on a showing of prosecutorial misconduct (People v. Colon, 13 N.Y.3d 343, 890 N.Y.S.2d 424, 918 N.E.2d 936 [2009] ), after he had served nearly 20 years in prison. Since plaintiff's federal and state tort claims against the City all arose in New York County, where the alleged misconduct occurred and where he was arrested and prosecuted, the motion for a change of venue pursuant to CPLR 504(3) was properly granted, notwithstanding that he was held in Rikers Island in Bronx County for 20 months prior to and during the criminal trial ( see Thames v. New York City Police Dept., 105 A.D.3d 481, 963 N.Y.S.2d 96 [1st Dept.2013]; Smith v. City of New York, 60 A.D.3d 540, 877 N.Y.S.2d 13 [1st Dept.2009] ).

Although plaintiff also alleges that he suffered physical injury when he was attacked by an inmate at Rikers Island, that incident does not form the basis of any distinct claim against the City based on misconduct of City officials occurring in Bronx County ( see Thames, 105 A.D.3d 481, 963 N.Y.S.2d 96; compare Rodriguez v. City of New York, 92 A.D.3d 596, 938 N.Y.S.2d 802 [1st Dept.2012] ). Plaintiff's tangential allegation in support of his federal civil rights claims, that the Police Department was deliberately indifferent to a pattern of similar police misconduct, including misconduct in other cases occurring in the Bronx, is an insufficient basis for finding that his own claims arose in Bronx County.

We have considered plaintiff's other arguments and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Ortiz v. Codella

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 4, 2014
123 A.D.3d 453 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Ortiz v. Codella

Case Details

Full title:Anthony ORTIZ, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Michael CODELLA, etc.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 4, 2014

Citations

123 A.D.3d 453 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
123 A.D.3d 453
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 8490

Citing Cases

Ramos v. City of N.Y.

this tortious conduct is alleged to have continued in Bronx County where Ramos was subjected to a…