From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ortiz v. City of Philadelphia

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 6, 2022
Civil Action 21-CV-3100 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 6, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 21-CV-3100

09-06-2022

ANDY ORTIZ, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.

AND NOW, this 6th day of September, 2022, upon consideration of Plaintiff Andy Ortiz's Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 23), it is ORDERED that:

1. Ortiz's claims based on supervisory liability, interference with the prison grievance process and failure to respond to a grievance, denial of access to the law library and counsel, denial of family communication, and violations of the Sixth Amendment are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim pursuant to under § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

2. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to TERMINATE Blanche Carney and Sgt./Supervisor Major Martin as Defendants.

3. The Clerk of Court shall issue summonses. Service of the summonses and the Second Amended Complaint shall be made upon Defendants C/O Lawton and Sgt. David Gill by the U.S. Marshals Service.

4. All original pleadings and other papers submitted for consideration to the Court in this case are to be filed with the Clerk of Court. Copies of papers filed in this Court are to be served upon counsel for all other parties (or directly on any party acting pro se). Service may be made by mail. Proof that service has been made is provided by a certificate of service. The certificate of service should be filed in the case along with the original papers and should show the day and manner of service. An example of a certificate of service by mail follows:

“I, (name), do hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing (name of pleading or other paper) has been served upon (name(s) of person(s) served) by placing the same in the U.S. mail, properly addressed, this (day) of (month), (year).
(Signature)”

5. Any request for court action shall be set forth in a motion, properly filed and served. The parties shall file all motions, including proof of service upon opposing parties, with the Clerk of Court. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules are to be followed. Ortiz is specifically directed to comply with Local Civil Rule 7.1 and serve and file a proper response to all motions within fourteen (14) days. Failure to do so may result in dismissal.

6. Ortiz is specifically directed to comply with Local Rule 26.1(f) which provides that “[n]o motion or other application pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governing discovery or pursuant to this rule shall be made unless it contains a certification of counsel that the parties, after reasonable effort, are unable to resolve the dispute.” Ortiz shall attempt to resolve any discovery disputes by contacting Defendants' counsel directly by telephone or through correspondence.

7. No direct communication is to take place with the United States District Judge or United States Magistrate Judge with regard to this case. All relevant information and papers are to be directed to the Clerk of Court.

8. In the event a summons is returned unexecuted, it is Ortiz's responsibility to ask the Clerk of Court to issue an alias summons and to provide the Clerk with the Defendant's correct address, so service can be made.

9. The parties should notify the Clerk's Office when there is an address change. Failure to do so could result in court orders or other information not being timely delivered, which could affect the parties' legal rights.


Summaries of

Ortiz v. City of Philadelphia

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 6, 2022
Civil Action 21-CV-3100 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Ortiz v. City of Philadelphia

Case Details

Full title:ANDY ORTIZ, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 6, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 21-CV-3100 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 6, 2022)