From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ortiz v. Baker

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Sep 30, 2010
3:10-cv-00290-HDM-RAM (D. Nev. Sep. 30, 2010)

Opinion

3:10-cv-00290-HDM-RAM.

September 30, 2010


ORDER


This is a pro se civil rights action, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 27, 2010, the court issued an order directing plaintiff to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies of the original complaint (docket #10). The court expressly warned plaintiff that failure to respond to this court's order would result in dismissal of this action. The order was served on plaintiff at his address of record. On August 23, 2010, the court denied plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of the July 27, 2010 order ( see docket #17).

More than the allotted time has elapsed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, this entire action is dismissed for failure to comply with the court's order.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED for the failure of plaintiff to file an amended complaint.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly and close this case.

DATED this 30th day of September, 2010.


Summaries of

Ortiz v. Baker

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Sep 30, 2010
3:10-cv-00290-HDM-RAM (D. Nev. Sep. 30, 2010)
Case details for

Ortiz v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:FRANK ORTIZ, #53155 Plaintiff, v. RENEE BAKER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Sep 30, 2010

Citations

3:10-cv-00290-HDM-RAM (D. Nev. Sep. 30, 2010)