From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orthodox Jewish Coal. of Chestnut Ridge v. Vill. of Chestnut Ridge, N.Y.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 24, 2022
7:19-cv-00443-KMK (S.D.N.Y. May. 24, 2022)

Opinion

7:19-cv-00443-KMK

05-24-2022

ORTHODOX JEWISH COALITION OF CHESTNUT RIDGE, an unincorporated association, CONGREGATION BIRCHAS YITZCHOK, a New York religious corporation, CONGREGATION DEXTER PARK, CONGREGATION TORAH U'TFILLA, a New York religious corporation, ABRAHAM WILLNER, and TZVI MILLER, Plaintiffs, v. VILLAGE OF CHESTNUT RIDGE, NEW YORK, Defendant

STORZER & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Roman Storzer, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiffs FEERICK NUGENT MACARTNEY PLLC Donald J, Feerick, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant SAVAD CHURGIN Joseph Churgin, Attorneys for Plaintiffs


STORZER & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

Roman Storzer, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

FEERICK NUGENT MACARTNEY PLLC

Donald J, Feerick, Esq.

Attorneys for Defendant

SAVAD CHURGIN

Joseph Churgin,

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

CONSENT DECREE

WHEREAS, the Plaintiffs brought this action against the Defendant pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violation of the Free Speech, Free Exercise, and Establishment clauses of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and the corresponding provisions of the New York State Constitution, the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc, et seq. (“RLUIPA”); and

WHEREAS, on April 17, 2020, Defendant moved to dismiss this action and Plaintiffs opposed that motion; and

WHEREAS, this Court granted Defendant's motion to dismiss on March 31, 2021; and

WHEREAS, on April 14, 2021, Plaintiffs moved for reconsideration of the Court's Order of March 31, 2021 and Defendant opposed that motion; and

WHEREAS, the Court granted Plaintiffs motion for reconsideration on August 13, 2021 and ordered that the Plaintiff-Congregations' and Plaintiff-Individuals' Equal Protection and State Law claims may proceed; and

WHEREAS, Defendant moved for reconsideration of the August 13, 2021 Order and Plaintiffs opposed that motion; and

WHEREAS, on December 28, 2021, the Court denied Defendant's motion for reconsideration of the August 13, 2021 Order; and

WHEREAS, the Defendant denies any and all liability; and

WHEREAS, the parties, having the mutual desire to settle this action and to avoid protracted, expensive and unnecessary litigation in the future.

NOW, THEREFORE, on agreement and stipulation of all parties, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:

I. DEFINITIONS

As used in this Consent Decree, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

1. “New Law” means the Local Law No. 1 of 2019 adopted by Resolution 2019-12 annexed hereto as Exhibit “A”.

2. “Plaintiffs” means those individuals and entities so identified and set forth in this action's caption, including the members of the Orthodox Jewish Coalition of Chestnut Ridge, and their successors and/or assigns.

The members of the Orthodox Jewish Coalition of Chestnut Ridge are: Congregation Torah U'Tfilla, Congregation Birchas Yitzchok, Congregation Dexter Park, and Bais Medrash Ohel Moshe.

3. “Defendant” means that municipal entity so identified and set forth in this action's caption.

4. “Parties” means Plaintiffs and Defendant.

5. “Substantial investment” means substantial construction (as that term is used under New York State's “vested rights” law) pursuant to a validly issued building permit and substantial expenditures prior to the effective date of this Agreement or a subsequent Court ruling overturning, enjoining, or otherwise rendering inapplicable the New Law to Plaintiff's property, as the case may be .

6. “House of Worship” means the same as that set forth in Local Law No. 1 of 2019 annexed at Exhibit “A”.

II. PRIMARY TERMS

7. Plaintiffs have the right to meaningfully apply under Local Law No. 1 of 2019 of the Village of Chestnut Ridge (“New Law”) to obtain a building permit or other land use approval subject to the following:

' a. Any such application has no guarantees of approval; and,
b. Plaintiffs' application must satisfy any and all referrals to other Village Boards, again, with no guarantee of approval before those Boards.

8. The Defendant and any of its subordinate boards, agencies or officials shall abide by any deadlines as may be applicable under the laws or regulations of the Village or State of New York, unless extended on consent of the Defendant and the Plaintiff applicant.

9. If, by June 30, 2023, a Plaintiff [i] has obtained a building permit and made a “substantial investment” under the New Law (see definitions) or [ii] has completed the construction of a structure on real property pursuant to such building permit under the New Law, such Plaintiff will be permitted to use such property as a House of Worship, subject to the terms of the New Law so long as there is no “Cessation in Use” as a House of Worship, as the term “Cessation in Use” is defined in the Village of Chestnut Ridge Zoning Code, Article XIII, 3, C.

10. If the New Law is overturned, a Plaintiffs project for which a Plaintiff has, by that time, acquired a vested right by [i] making a “substantial investment” in the construction of a structure on real property pursuant to a building permit or [2] completing the construction of a structure on real property pursuant to such a building permit, such Plaintiff will be grandfathered as a conforming use (and not a prior existing non-conforming use) so long as there has not been a “Cessation in Use” as a House of Worship, as the term “Cessation in Use” is defined in the Village of Chestnut Ridge Zoning Code, Article XIII, 3, C.

III. MISCELLANEOUS TERMS AND PROVISIONS

11. The acts done and evidenced by this Consent Decree, and the agreements made herein, are done and made solely to compromise disputed claims and to avoid future litigation costs, and each Party agrees that neither the execution and performance of this Consent Decree nor any of its terms or conditions shall be construed or considered, by either of the Parties or by any other person, as an admission by either Party of any liability/or wrongdoing or as a concession that any allegation made by the other Party is true or has any merit whatsoever.

12. All parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees, costs and expenses. No damages for attorneys' fees, costs or expenses shall be sought by or awarded to any party from another.

13. Any Amendment or modification to this Consent Decree shall only be valid if in writing and signed by Plaintiffs and Defendant, or their respective counsel.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Orthodox Jewish Coal. of Chestnut Ridge v. Vill. of Chestnut Ridge, N.Y.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 24, 2022
7:19-cv-00443-KMK (S.D.N.Y. May. 24, 2022)
Case details for

Orthodox Jewish Coal. of Chestnut Ridge v. Vill. of Chestnut Ridge, N.Y.

Case Details

Full title:ORTHODOX JEWISH COALITION OF CHESTNUT RIDGE, an unincorporated…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 24, 2022

Citations

7:19-cv-00443-KMK (S.D.N.Y. May. 24, 2022)