From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ortega v. USD Court

United States District Court, District of Kansas
Oct 30, 2023
No. 23-3213-JWL (D. Kan. Oct. 30, 2023)

Opinion

23-3213-JWL

10-30-2023

ISMAEL DELEON ORTEGA, JR., Petitioner, v. USD COURT, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOHN W. LUNGSTRUM UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Petitioner brings this pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner is in custody at the Seward County Jail in Liberal, Kansas (“SCJ”). The Court screened the Petition (Doc. 1) under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases, foll. 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and entered a Memorandum and Order to Show Cause (Doc. 3) (“MOSC”) ordering Petitioner to show good cause, in writing, why this matter should not be dismissed under the abstention doctrines set forth in Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971), and Ex Parte Royall, 117 U.S. 241 (1886). Petitioner has filed a response (Doc 4).

In his response, Petitioner makes arguments regarding the underlying search in his criminal cases and indicates that his van was damaged. (Doc. 4.) However, Petitioner does not address abstention as set forth in the Court's MOSC.

The Court found in the MOSC that to the extent Petitioner is asserting a claim regarding his conditions of confinement by stating that there are bugs in the SCJ, his claim is denied. Any challenges to his conditions of confinement must be brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

The Court also found in the MOSC that the instant Petition does not allege the type of circumstances under which Ex Parte Royall allows federal-court intervention, and the three conditions in Younger appear to be satisfied with respect to Petitioner's current criminal prosecutions in the District Court of Seward County, Kansas.

Petitioner has failed to show good cause why this matter should not be summarily dismissed without prejudice under Ex Parte Royall and Younger. Petitioner has also failed to submit a signed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with the financial information required by D. Kan. Rule 9.1(g)(2)(A) by the Court's deadline set forth in the MOSC.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT that this matter is dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ortega v. USD Court

United States District Court, District of Kansas
Oct 30, 2023
No. 23-3213-JWL (D. Kan. Oct. 30, 2023)
Case details for

Ortega v. USD Court

Case Details

Full title:ISMAEL DELEON ORTEGA, JR., Petitioner, v. USD COURT, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, District of Kansas

Date published: Oct 30, 2023

Citations

No. 23-3213-JWL (D. Kan. Oct. 30, 2023)