. “‘A party seeking reconsideration may neither repeat arguments already briefed, considered and decided[,] nor advance new facts, issues or arguments not previously presented to the Court.'” Ortega v. Uber Techs. Inc., No. 15 Civ. 7387 (NGG) (JO), 2017 WL 1737636, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. May 2, 2017) (quoting Schoolcraft v. City of N.Y., 248 F.Supp.3d 506, 508 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)). A motion for reconsideration is not a “vehicle for relitigating old issues, presenting the case under new theories, securing a rehearing on the merits, or otherwise taking a second bite at the apple.”