From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ortega v. Sanchez

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
May 19, 2021
194 A.D.3d 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

2020-00153

05-19-2021

In the Matter of Alfredo Intriago Ortega, petitioner-respondent, v. Joyce Sanchez, appellant, Administration for Children's Services, respondent-respondent. Richard J. Cardinale, Brooklyn, NY, for appellant. Michael E. Lipson, Jericho, NY, for petitioner-respondent.

James E. Johnson, Corporation Counsel, New York, NY (Rebecca L. Visgaitis and Julia Bedell of counsel), for respondent-respondent. Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Dawne A. Mitchell and Susan Clement of counsel), attorney for the child.


HECTOR D. LASALLE FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ. (Docket No. V-1976-18)

James E. Johnson, Corporation Counsel, New York, NY (Rebecca L. Visgaitis and Julia Bedell of counsel), for respondent-respondent.

Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Dawne A. Mitchell and Susan Clement of counsel), attorney for the child.

DECISION & ORDER

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Joan L. Piccirillo, J.), dated July 2, 2019. The order, upon the consent of the parties, granted that branch of the father's petition which was for sole custody of the subject child.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The record reflects that during an appearance before the Family Court, the mother consented on the record to the order awarding sole custody of the subject child to the father. No appeal lies from an order entered upon consent of the appealing party (see CPLR 5511; Matter of Chloe W. [Tara W.], 188 AD3d 707, 708; Matter of Jessica M. v Julio G.R., 176 AD3d 584; Matter of Abigail R. [Ishwardat R.], 125 AD3d 780, 781; Matter of Cooper v Administration for Children's Servs., 293 AD2d 605). To the extent that the mother contends that her consent to the order was not voluntary or was otherwise invalid, her remedy is to move in the Family Court to vacate the order (see Matter of Rinaldi v Faiella, 172 AD3d 871, 872; Matter of Comoletti v Papapietro, 171 AD3d 745, 746; Matter of Sasha J.J. [Danielle L.], 144 AD3d 681, 682; Elsayed v Edrees, 141 AD3d 503, 504).

HINDS-RADIX, J.P., LASALLE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur. ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court


Summaries of

Ortega v. Sanchez

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
May 19, 2021
194 A.D.3d 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

Ortega v. Sanchez

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Alfredo Intriago Ortega, petitioner-respondent, v. Joyce…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: May 19, 2021

Citations

194 A.D.3d 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 3185
144 N.Y.S.3d 387