From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orso v. Dunkowski

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Aug 4, 2021
8:21-mc-46-JSM-AEP (M.D. Fla. Aug. 4, 2021)

Opinion

8:21-mc-46-JSM-AEP

08-04-2021

MATTHEW ORSO AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE TO KENNETH D. BELL IN HIS CAPACITY AS COURT-APPOINTED RECEIVER FOR REX VENTURE GROUP, LLC, d/b/a ZEEKREWARDS.COM, Plaintiff, v. RYSZARD DUNKOWSKI, Defendant.


ORDER

ANTHONY E. PORCELLI, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.1, Plaintiff Nationwide Judgment Recovery, LLC, as Assignee of Matthew Orso as Successor Trustee to Kenneth D. Bell in His Capacity as Court-Appointed Receiver For Rex Venture Group, LLC, D/B/A ZEEKREWARDS.COM (“Plaintiff”), requests that the Court specially appoint any employee or agent of ABC Legal, who is otherwise legally permitted to effectuate service of process under applicable law, to serve the court-ordered writs in this matter upon the garnishees. Federal law governs who may serve a writ of garnishment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 69(a)(1) (“The procedure ... in proceedings supplementary to and in aid of judgment ... must accord with the procedure of the state where the court is located but a federal statute governs to the extent it applies.”). The Federal Rules have the “force and effect” of a federal statute. See Sibbach v. Wilson & Co., 312 U.S. 1, 13 (1941) (stating a federal rule established within the power delegated to the Supreme Court “has the force of a federal statute”). In turn, the Federal Rules permit the appointment of a special process server to deliver a writ of garnishment like the one at issue here. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.1 (“Process-other than a summons under Rule 4 or a subpoena under Rule 45-must be served by a United States marshal or deputy marshal or by a person specially appointed for that purpose.”); see also Sumner v. Garner, No. 6:18-CV-40-ORL-28GJK, 2019 WL 6716193, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Dec. 9, 2019); Francois v. Washmonbo, Inc., No. 05-23368-CIV, 2008 WL 2694752, at *2 (S.D. Fla. July 8, 2008). Accordingly, this Court authorizes any employee or agent of ABC Legal, who is otherwise legally permitted to effectuate service of process under applicable law, to serve the writs of garnishment on the garnishees in this matter.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Orso v. Dunkowski

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Aug 4, 2021
8:21-mc-46-JSM-AEP (M.D. Fla. Aug. 4, 2021)
Case details for

Orso v. Dunkowski

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW ORSO AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE TO KENNETH D. BELL IN HIS CAPACITY AS…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Aug 4, 2021

Citations

8:21-mc-46-JSM-AEP (M.D. Fla. Aug. 4, 2021)