From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orso v. Disner

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 11, 2023
2:23-cv-01608-JAD-DJA (D. Nev. Oct. 11, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-01608-JAD-DJA

10-11-2023

Matthew E. Orso, Plaintiff, v. Todd Disner and Samuel Timpson, Defendants.


ORDER

DANIEL J. ALBREGTS, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Before the Court is Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc.'s motion to substitute attorney (ECF No. 4) and motion for writ of execution (ECF No. 5). The Court denies the motion to substitute. Under Local Rule IA 11-6(c), “[a] stipulation to substitute attorneys must be signed by the newly-appearing attorneys, the withdrawing attorneys, and the represented client and be approved by the court.” Here, Nationwide's motion to substitute attorney is not signed by Plaintiff Matthew E. Orso. While Nationwide states in the motion to substitute that it is the assignee of Orso, it provides no further explanation and there is nothing on the docket indicating that Orso has assigned his interests in this case. The Court also denies the motion for writ of execution. The plaintiff identified in the writ (Nationwide) is not the plaintiff identified in the judgment papers (Orso). Compare ECF No. 1 with ECF No. 5.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion to substitute attorney (ECF No. 4) is denied without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for writ of execution (ECF No. 5) is denied without prejudice.


Summaries of

Orso v. Disner

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 11, 2023
2:23-cv-01608-JAD-DJA (D. Nev. Oct. 11, 2023)
Case details for

Orso v. Disner

Case Details

Full title:Matthew E. Orso, Plaintiff, v. Todd Disner and Samuel Timpson, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 11, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-01608-JAD-DJA (D. Nev. Oct. 11, 2023)