From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orsenigo v. Burnstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 21, 1994
202 A.D.2d 561 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

March 21, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Luciano, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the defendants' contention, we find that the affirmation submitted by the plaintiff's treating physician was sufficient to raise a triable issue as to whether the plaintiff suffered a serious injury. In that affirmation, the physician indicated that the plaintiff had suffered a permanent disc dessication, which, based on the plaintiff's history, was causally related to the accident. Mangano, P.J., Balletta, O'Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Orsenigo v. Burnstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 21, 1994
202 A.D.2d 561 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Orsenigo v. Burnstein

Case Details

Full title:THERESA ORSENIGO, Respondent, v. RITA BURNSTEIN et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 21, 1994

Citations

202 A.D.2d 561 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
610 N.Y.S.2d 819

Citing Cases

Vignola v. Varrichio

that, although Mr. Vignola had "full abduction" and "full extension" with pain, Mr. Vignola "appeared to lack…

Torres v. Micheletti

In support of their motion for summary judgment, the defendants relied primarily upon the unsworn reports of…