From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orr v. Legrand

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 15, 2013
3:12-cv-00436-RCJ-VPC (D. Nev. Jan. 15, 2013)

Opinion

3:12-cv-00436-RCJ-VPC

01-15-2013

STEVEN ORR, Petitioner, v. ROBERT LEGRAND, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

This closed case is a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On October 19, 2012, this Court entered an order denying the habeas petition as successive and denying a certificate of appealability. (ECF No. 3). Judgment was entered the same date. (ECF No. 4). Pending before this Court are petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and petitioner's motion for a certificate of appealability. (ECF Nos. 5 & 6).

Based on the information in petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, the application is granted. Petitioner will not be required to prepay any portion of the $455.00 filing fee for his appeal.

Petitioner's motion for a certificate of appealability is denied. The Court previously denied petitioner a certificate of appealability by order filed October 19, 2012. (ECF No. 3)

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (ECF No. 5) is GRANTED. Petitioner shall not be required to make any prepayment of the filing fee for his appeal.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for a certificate of appealability (ECF No. 6) is DENIED.

______________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Orr v. Legrand

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 15, 2013
3:12-cv-00436-RCJ-VPC (D. Nev. Jan. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Orr v. Legrand

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN ORR, Petitioner, v. ROBERT LEGRAND, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 15, 2013

Citations

3:12-cv-00436-RCJ-VPC (D. Nev. Jan. 15, 2013)