From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orozco v. Norton

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Mar 28, 2023
Civ. 2:20-cv-316-MK (D. Or. Mar. 28, 2023)

Opinion

Civ. 2:20-cv-316-MK

03-28-2023

MARCUS KELO OROZCO, Plaintiff, v. DR. BENNETTE “BEN” NORTON, M.D. Et al., Defendants.


ORDER

MCSHANE, JUDGE:

Magistrate Judge Mustafa Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation, (ECF No. 68), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Both parties filed objections. Accordingly, the Court reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).

The Court finds no error and concludes the report is correct. Although this is a close call, Plaintiff submitted evidence that perhaps equitable tolling should apply to his claims. Although Plaintiff saw multiple providers, including Dr. Norton himself, on over 50 medical appointments after the 2014 appointment at issue, Plaintiff did not mention, even on one occasion, any pain or discomfort from his hernia. That said, Plaintiff submitted a sworn declaration stating that he was too fearful of retaliation from Dr. Norton “to bring up this specific subject matter of my hernia injury” again. Orozco Decl. ¶ 38. Whether Plaintiff was in fact too fearful of retaliation to (1) mention his hernia or (2) file a grievance related to the 2014 appointment is, by the slimmest of margins, a question for the jury.

Magistrate Judge Kasubhai's Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 68) is ADOPTED. Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 28) is GRANTED with respect to (1) Plaintiff's Eight Amendment claim against all Defendants except Dr. Norton and (2) Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment claim against all Defendants. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's First Amendment and Eight Amendment claims against Dr. Norton.

The parties are granted 30 days to consider whether to consent to trial before Magistrate Judge Kasubhai. In the absence of full consent, Judge McShane's courtroom deputy will contact the parties to obtain dates for a late Summer or early Fall 2023 trial in Pendleton, Oregon.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Orozco v. Norton

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Mar 28, 2023
Civ. 2:20-cv-316-MK (D. Or. Mar. 28, 2023)
Case details for

Orozco v. Norton

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS KELO OROZCO, Plaintiff, v. DR. BENNETTE “BEN” NORTON, M.D. Et al.…

Court:United States District Court, District of Oregon

Date published: Mar 28, 2023

Citations

Civ. 2:20-cv-316-MK (D. Or. Mar. 28, 2023)