From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orozco-Martinez v. Pugh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Jan 23, 2013
Case No. 12-C-0903 (E.D. Wis. Jan. 23, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 12-C-0903

01-23-2013

SAMUEL OROZCO-MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. JEFFREY PUGH, Warden, Stanley Correctional Institution, Respondent.


ORDER

Samuel Orozco-Martinez has filed a habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In an order dated September 13, 2012, I ordered the respondent to file an answer to the petition. In that same order, I set out a briefing schedule for briefing the merits of the petition. Pursuant to that schedule, petitioner was to file his brief in support of his petition within 45 days of the date on which respondent filed his answer. The respondent filed his answer on October 15, 2012, and he filed a supplement to his answer on November 13, 2012. Petitioner's brief was thus due no later than the end of December 2012. However, to date, petitioner has not filed a brief.

Petitioner is hereby warned that unless he files a brief in support of his petition by February 25, 2013, I will assume that he has abandoned this case and will dismiss it.

SO ORDERED at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 23rd day of January, 2013.

________

LYNN ADELMAN

District Judge


Summaries of

Orozco-Martinez v. Pugh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Jan 23, 2013
Case No. 12-C-0903 (E.D. Wis. Jan. 23, 2013)
Case details for

Orozco-Martinez v. Pugh

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL OROZCO-MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. JEFFREY PUGH, Warden, Stanley…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Date published: Jan 23, 2013

Citations

Case No. 12-C-0903 (E.D. Wis. Jan. 23, 2013)