From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'ROURKE v. A.I. NAMM SON, INC

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 14, 1946
68 N.E.2d 61 (N.Y. 1946)

Opinion

Submitted May 23, 1946

Decided June 14, 1946

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, WILSON, J.

Esther R. Brause and Leonard Acker for appellants.

William L. Shumate for respondents.


Judgment of Appellate Division reversed and that of Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, on the ground that there was evidence of negligence proper to be submitted to the jury; no opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, THACHER and FULD, JJ. Taking no part: DYE, J.


Summaries of

O'ROURKE v. A.I. NAMM SON, INC

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 14, 1946
68 N.E.2d 61 (N.Y. 1946)
Case details for

O'ROURKE v. A.I. NAMM SON, INC

Case Details

Full title:ELEANOR O'ROURKE et al., Appellants, v. A.I. NAMM SON, INC., et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 14, 1946

Citations

68 N.E.2d 61 (N.Y. 1946)
68 N.E.2d 61

Citing Cases

DeGeorge v. City of New York

We concede that there is a serious question as to whether the board had the duty to foresee that a school…

Caputi v. Loblaw, Inc.

Present — Simons, J.P., Hancock, Jr., Doerr, Witmer and Moule, JJ. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs…