From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orosco v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 28, 2011
No. CIV S-08-3075-JAM-TJB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-3075-JAM-TJB.

January 28, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On November 29, 2010, the magistrate judge filed an order, findings and recommendations herein, which was served on all parties, and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 29, 2010, are adopted in full;
2. Petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED;
3. Petitioner's claim for declaratory and injunctive relief is DENIED;
4. The Clerk is directed to close the case; and
5. The court declines to issue a certificate of appealability.

DATED: January 27, 2011


Summaries of

Orosco v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 28, 2011
No. CIV S-08-3075-JAM-TJB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Orosco v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:LUIS CARDENAS OROSCO, Petitioner, v. D. K. SISTO, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 28, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-08-3075-JAM-TJB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2011)