From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orosco v. Hartman

United States District Court, Central District of California
Aug 15, 2024
5:23cv01858 DDP (DTBx) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2024)

Opinion

5:23cv01858 DDP (DTBx)

08-15-2024

ALVARO OROSCO v. PATRICK HARTMAN; ET AL.


Present: The Honorable: DEAN D. PREGERSON, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that PLAINTIFF show cause in writing not later than September 6, 2024 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to defendant Patrick Hartman doing business as Java Station, only. In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7.15, oral argument shall not be heard in the above matter unless so ordered by the Court. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of briefs.

Plaintiff is advised that the Court will consider Plaintiff's filing of a application for the clerk to enter default judgment on defendant Patrick Hartman doing business as Java Station, or plaintiff's filing of a motion for entry of default judgment on defendant on or before the above date, as a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause.


Summaries of

Orosco v. Hartman

United States District Court, Central District of California
Aug 15, 2024
5:23cv01858 DDP (DTBx) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2024)
Case details for

Orosco v. Hartman

Case Details

Full title:ALVARO OROSCO v. PATRICK HARTMAN; ET AL.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Aug 15, 2024

Citations

5:23cv01858 DDP (DTBx) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2024)