From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oros v. Automattic, Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 17, 2023
23-mc-80002-LJC (N.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2023)

Opinion

23-mc-80002-LJC

01-17-2023

NICHOLAE GABRIEL OROS, Plaintiff, v. AUTOMATTIC, INC., Defendant.


ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING DISMISSAL RE: DKT. NO. 2

LISA J. CISNEROS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court denied Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) without prejudice. Dkt. No. 3. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, Plaintiff shall file a renewed IFP application that adequately shows he is indigent or pay the $49.00 filing fee in full. Should Plaintiff fail to respond in accordance with this order, the Court will recommend that Plaintiff's claims be dismissed without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Oros v. Automattic, Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 17, 2023
23-mc-80002-LJC (N.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2023)
Case details for

Oros v. Automattic, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAE GABRIEL OROS, Plaintiff, v. AUTOMATTIC, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 17, 2023

Citations

23-mc-80002-LJC (N.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2023)