From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ornelas v. Haynes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Mar 24, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:18-CV-65 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 24, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:18-CV-65

03-24-2021

JUAN JAVIER ORNELAS v. LEONTYNE HAYNES


**NOT FOR PRINTED PUBLICATION**

ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS AND ACCEPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Juan Javier Ornelas, a prisoner previously confined at the Eastham Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Leontyne Haynes.

The Court ordered that this matter be referred to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The Magistrate Judge recommends granting defendant's motion for summary judgment.

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record and the pleadings. Plaintiff filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and the applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). For the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, defendant's motion for summary judgment should be granted because plaintiff did not exhaust administrative remedies before he filed this action. Plaintiff alleges that prison employees prevented him from exhausting administrative remedies. Contrary to plaintiff's assertion, the record reflects that he was able to file both steps of the grievance procedure. However, his retaliation claim is unexhausted because plaintiff did not follow the proper procedure by raising the claim in his Step 1 grievance.

ORDER

Plaintiff's objections (document no. 90) are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge (document no. 87) is ACCEPTED. Defendant's motion for summary judgment (document no. 64) is GRANTED. A final judgment will be entered in accordance with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation.

So ORDERED and SIGNED, Mar 24, 2021.

/s/_________

Ron Clark

Senior Judge


Summaries of

Ornelas v. Haynes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Mar 24, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:18-CV-65 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 24, 2021)
Case details for

Ornelas v. Haynes

Case Details

Full title:JUAN JAVIER ORNELAS v. LEONTYNE HAYNES

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 24, 2021

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:18-CV-65 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 24, 2021)