From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ormello v. A. Biancardi & Sons, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 29, 2022
22 Civ. 4695 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 29, 2022)

Opinion

22 Civ. 4695 (AT)

06-29-2022

OSCAR ORMELLO, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. A. Biancaidi & Sons, Inc., doing business as Biancardi's Meats; and Anthony Biancaidi; and Salvatore L. Biancaidi, Defendants.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES, District Judge.

To protect the public health, while promoting the “just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of eveiy action and proceeding,” Fed.R.Civ.P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place “before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28” if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discoveiy through remote means at eveiy available opportunity.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ormello v. A. Biancardi & Sons, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 29, 2022
22 Civ. 4695 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Ormello v. A. Biancardi & Sons, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:OSCAR ORMELLO, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 29, 2022

Citations

22 Civ. 4695 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 29, 2022)