Orlomoski v. Neven

1 Citing case

  1. Winn v. Neven

    Case No.: 2:16-cv-00273-GMN-PAL (D. Nev. Aug. 21, 2018)   Cited 1 times

    Notably, there is no due process violation for denying witnesses who lack any new relevant information. See Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 321 (1976); Orlomoski v. Neven, No. 2:10-CV-01250-GMN, 2011 WL 3585498, at *3 (D. Nev. Aug. 16, 2011) (finding no due process violation for denying witnesses who provide redundant testimony); Ellis v. Benedetti, No. 3:08-CV-0657-ECR-RAM, 2009 WL 10691065, at *3 (D. Nev. Apr. 8, 2009) ("The refusal to allow a prisoner to present redundant evidence does not constitute a violation of the right to due process."). At the hearing, Officer Barth denied Plaintiff's request to call Officer Thompson and Officer Keller because the officers had already given their written report prior to the hearing.