From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orlando v. Rose

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 15, 2008
974 So. 2d 554 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. 5D07-2393.

February 15, 2008.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Cynthia Z. MacKinnon, Judge.

Lee A. Freeman, Orlando, for Appellant.

Kathleen T. Gillard, of Kathleen T. Gillard, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.


The finder of fact is not required to believe the testimony of any witness, even if unrebutted. Dep't of Highway Safety Motor Vehicles v. Dean, 662 So.2d 371 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); State v. Paul, 638 So.2d 537 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Orlando v. Rose

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 15, 2008
974 So. 2d 554 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Orlando v. Rose

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF ORLANDO POLICE DEPARTMENT, Appellant, v. Kwame ROSE and Ashanni…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Feb 15, 2008

Citations

974 So. 2d 554 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Citing Cases

Stanley v. Bank of Am., N.A.

As the fact-finder, a magistrate may reject testimony that he or she disbelieves. E.g., City of Orlando…

Riley v. Lien

At the evidentiary hearing, Riley's testimony regarding the extent of his income decline was substantially…