From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orlando v. Palladino

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Nov 1, 1908
61 Misc. 103 (N.Y. App. Term 1908)

Opinion

November, 1908.

Pace Stimpson, for appellant.

Andrew S. Fraser, for respondent.


The learned justice in the City Court filed a memorandum announcing his decision of a motion without mentioning costs; but in the order he signed and which was entered thereon he imposed costs. From that comes this appeal, which is frivolous, as the justice had power to revise or recall his decision. Post v. Cobb, 13 N.Y.S. 555. In the case (Siegrist v. Holloway, 7 Civ. Pro. 58) cited by the appellant, cited now and again on such motions, and even in a respectable handbook on practice, as authority otherwise, the order was seemingly entered by the clerk who, of course, had no power to enlarge the decision of the county judge.

Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs to the respondent.

GILDERSLEEVE and SEABURY, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs to respondent.


Summaries of

Orlando v. Palladino

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Nov 1, 1908
61 Misc. 103 (N.Y. App. Term 1908)
Case details for

Orlando v. Palladino

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO ORLANDO, Appellant, v . ANGELO PALLADINO, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Nov 1, 1908

Citations

61 Misc. 103 (N.Y. App. Term 1908)
112 N.Y.S. 1118