From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orlando Partners v. Classic Tour

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 10, 1986
492 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Summary

holding there was no excusable neglect where wife stated she told her husband about receipt of summons but forgot to tell him about hearing on motion for entry of default and husband did not recall knowledge of summons

Summary of this case from Chernoff Diamond & Co. v. Gallin Assocs., Inc.

Opinion

No. 86-58.

July 29, 1986. Rehearing Denied September 10, 1986.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, James C. Henderson, J.

Elliot L. Miller, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Richard B. Austin, Miami, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and HUBBART, JJ.


Plaintiff Orlando Partners, Ltd. appeals a non-final order setting aside a judgment and vacating a default entered against Robert and Joyce LaPointe, a husband and wife.

The issue on appeal is whether the wife's and the husband's affidavits established the requisite excusable neglect for granting relief from judgment. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.540(b).

The wife's affidavit stated that she had been served with the summons and complaint and that she told her husband about her receipt of such papers, as he handled all legal matters. She further stated that she received the notice of hearing on the motion for entry of default, but forgot to mention it to her husband until after the time for the hearing had passed. The husband's affidavit concurred with his wife's except that he said that he did not recall his wife telling him about her receipt of the summons and complaint.

We hold that such statements do not establish excusable neglect. See Moore v. Powell, 480 So.2d 137 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Abel, Tony and Aldo Creative Group, Inc. v. Friday Night Investors, Inc., 419 So.2d 1135 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); John Crescent, Inc. v. Schwartz, 382 So.2d 383 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Claffey v. Serafino, 338 So.2d 270 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976). Accordingly, the non-final order setting aside the judgment and vacating the default is reversed and the cause remanded for reinstatement of the judgment.

Reversed.


Summaries of

Orlando Partners v. Classic Tour

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 10, 1986
492 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

holding there was no excusable neglect where wife stated she told her husband about receipt of summons but forgot to tell him about hearing on motion for entry of default and husband did not recall knowledge of summons

Summary of this case from Chernoff Diamond & Co. v. Gallin Assocs., Inc.
Case details for

Orlando Partners v. Classic Tour

Case Details

Full title:ORLANDO PARTNERS, LTD., D/B/A SHERATON ORLANDO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT INN…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 10, 1986

Citations

492 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

O'Donnell v. Opolka

Affirmed. See Orlando Partners, Ltd. v. Classic Tour Lines, 492 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 3d DCA), review dismissed,…

General Power Prod. v. Woodmont Prop

Affirmed. See Moore v. Powell, 480 So.2d 137 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); see also Kozich v. Hartford Ins. Co. of…