From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oretech, Inc. v. Pacific Rocky Mountain, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jun 7, 2006
No. CIV 04-0145-PHX-MHM (D. Ariz. Jun. 7, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV 04-0145-PHX-MHM.

June 7, 2006


ORDER


At a hearing on December 12, 2005, the Court denied the stipulation to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff Oretech, Inc. (Doc. 46 48). The Court denied the stipulation to withdraw because a substitution of counsel had not been filed. Plaintiff's counsel indicated at that hearing that Plaintiff Oretech, Inc., was in the process of seeking new counsel. No substitution of counsel has been filed since the date of the hearing. Plaintiff's counsel has filed a renewed motion to withdraw, stating that counsel should not be required to continue to represent Plaintiff Oretech, Inc. while Plaintiff seeks new counsel. (Doc. 49). Plaintiff's counsel has cited Mohr, Hackett, etc v. Superior Court of the State of Arizona, etc., 745 P.2d 208 (Ariz.App. 1987), which held that the rule against corporate self-representation does not permit a blanket prohibition against the withdrawal of counsel solely on the basis of the client's status as a corporation. The Arizona Court of Appeals noted that some courts either direct the corporation to obtain counsel during a specific period of time or stay the action while the corporate party obtains new counsel.

In this case, the first stipulation to withdraw was signed by corporate representative Mr. H. Stephen Shehane and provided Mr. Shehane's address and telephone number. The stipulation therefore complied with LRCiv 83.3(b)(1). Another corporate representative, Mr. Robert Rath, appeared by telephone at the December 12th hearing. The renewed motion to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff (Doc. 49) is granted.

"It is a longstanding rule that `[c]orporations and other unincorporated associations must appear in court through an attorney.'" D-Beam Limited Partnership v. Roller Derby Skates, Inc., 366 F.3d 972, 973-74 (9th Cir. 2004) (quoted citation omitted). Plaintiff Oretech, Inc., shall have 14 days to obtain counsel in this action. The Law Firm of Ellis Venable, P.C., shall provide a copy of this Order to the appropriate representative of the corporate Plaintiff. The Clerk of Court shall provide a copy of this Order to Mr. H. Stephen Shehane, c/o Oretech, Inc., P.O. Box 1735, Columbus, Georgia 31902-1735.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff (Doc. 49) is granted. The Law Firm of Ellis Venable, P.C., shall be permitted to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Oretech, Inc., shall have 14 days from the filing date of this Order to obtain counsel.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that The Law Firm of Ellis Venable, P.C., shall provide a copy of this Order to the appropriate representative of the corporate Plaintiff.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to provide a copy of this Order to Mr. H. Stephen Shehane, c/o Oretech, Inc., P.O. Box 1735, Columbus, Georgia 31902-1735.


Summaries of

Oretech, Inc. v. Pacific Rocky Mountain, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jun 7, 2006
No. CIV 04-0145-PHX-MHM (D. Ariz. Jun. 7, 2006)
Case details for

Oretech, Inc. v. Pacific Rocky Mountain, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Oretech, Inc. f/k/a the Tantivity Group, Plaintiff, v. Pacific Rocky…

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Jun 7, 2006

Citations

No. CIV 04-0145-PHX-MHM (D. Ariz. Jun. 7, 2006)