From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orenstein v. Orenstein

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Mar 5, 1969
59 Misc. 2d 565 (N.Y. App. Term 1969)

Opinion

March 5, 1969

Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County, LEONARD L. FINZ, J.

Milton M. Meyer for appellant.

Dikman Dikman ( Michael Dikman of counsel), for respondent.


The remedy of summary judgment in lieu of a complaint is available only in an action "based upon a judgment or instrument for the payment of money only" (CPLR 3213). The instant suit, to recover payments pursuant to a separation agreement, does not come within the purview of the quoted language (see, Signal Plan v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 23 A.D.2d 636, 637; Guele v. Scaiano, 56 Misc.2d 1040; Burnell v. Peoples Sav. Bank, 54 Misc.2d 140).

The order should be unanimously reversed, with $10 costs to defendant, motion denied and plaintiff's time to serve a complaint extended until 10 days after service of a copy of the order hereon.

Concur — GROAT, P.J., SCHWARTZWALD and MARGETT, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Orenstein v. Orenstein

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Mar 5, 1969
59 Misc. 2d 565 (N.Y. App. Term 1969)
Case details for

Orenstein v. Orenstein

Case Details

Full title:LINA ORENSTEIN, Respondent, v. ROBERT ORENSTEIN, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Mar 5, 1969

Citations

59 Misc. 2d 565 (N.Y. App. Term 1969)
299 N.Y.S.2d 648

Citing Cases

Wagner v. Cornblum

Here, plaintiff's claim is presumptively meritorious. "An instrument for the payment of money only" has been…

Wagner v. Cornblum

promissory note]; Seaman-AndwallCorp. v. Wright Mach. Corp., 31 A.D.2d 136 [promissory note not in dispute];…