Opinion
2:23-cv-00767-RFB-DJA
08-07-2023
MCNUTT LAW FIRM. P.C. Daniel R. McNutt, Esq. Matthew C. Wolf, Esq. Counsel for Defendant LADAH LAW FIRM Ramzy Ladah, Esq., Bar No. 11405 Joseph Chu, Esq., Bar No. 11082 Counsel for Plaintiffs
MCNUTT LAW FIRM. P.C.
Daniel R. McNutt, Esq.
Matthew C. Wolf, Esq.
Counsel for Defendant
LADAH LAW FIRM
Ramzy Ladah, Esq., Bar No. 11405
Joseph Chu, Esq., Bar No. 11082
Counsel for Plaintiffs
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY
(FIRST REQUEST)
Defendant The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, a Utah corporation sole (Defendant) and Plaintiffs Astrid Lemus Orellana and Miriam Ordonez (Plaintiffs) hereby stipulate to extend the remaining discovery and pretrial deadlines by 60 days. This is the parties' first request to extend the deadlines.
I. CURRENT DEADLINES.
The following are the current deadlines:
CURRENT DEADLINE | EVENT |
09/14/2023 | Deadline for Initial Expert Disclosures |
10/16/2023 | Deadline for Rebuttal Expert Disclosures |
11/13/2023 | Close of Discovery |
12/13/2023 | Deadline for Dispositive Motions |
01/12/2024 | Deadline for the Joint Pretrial Order (the filing of a dispositive motion will suspend the joint pre-trial order deadline until 30 days after a decision on the motion or until otherwise ordered by the court) |
II. DISCOVERY CONDUCTED TO DATE.
To date, the parties have exchanged disclosures. Defendant has propounded written discovery on Plaintiffs. Defendant is in the process of scheduling independent medical examinations of Plaintiffs.
III. DESCRIPTION OF THE REMAINING DISCOVERY.
The parties wish to disclose experts, serve additional written discovery and subpoenas duces tecum, and depose additional nonparty witnesses and experts.
IV. REASONS FOR EXTENDING THE DEADLINES.
LR 26-3 states the following, in relevant part:
A motion or stipulation to extend any date set by the discovery plan, scheduling order, or other order must, in addition to satisfying the requirements of LR IA 6-1, be supported by a showing of good cause for the extension. A motion or stipulation to extend a deadline set forth in a discovery plan must be received by the court no later than 21 days before the expiration of the subject deadline. A request made within 21 days of the subject deadline must be supported by a showing of good cause. A request made after the expiration of the subject deadline will not be granted unless the movant also demonstrates that the failure to act was the result of excusable neglect.
Defendant wishes to extend all deadlines by 60 days because they cannot meet the current initial expert disclosure deadline. Defendant needs to obtain Plaintiff Astrid Orellana's brain MRIs and other images and inspect the subject vehicle. One of Defendant's consultants lives out of state, and he needs more time to conduct his investigation and prepare his initial expert report. Defendant immediately asked Plaintiffs to extend the pretrial deadlines once they became aware of the need for the additional time by the consultant. Plaintiffs graciously agreed to a 60-day extension.
IV. PROPOSED EXTENDED DEADLINES.
The parties propose extending the deadlines as follows:
PROPOSED EXTENDED DEADLINE | CURRENT DEADLINE | EVENT |
11/13/2023 | 09/14/2023 | Deadline for Initial Expert Disclosures |
12/15/2023 | 10/16/2023 | Deadline for Rebuttal Expert Disclosures |
PROPOSED EXTENDED DEADLINE | CURRENT DEADLINE | EVENT |
01/12/2024 | 11/13/2023 | Close of Discovery |
12/13/2023 | Deadline for Dispositive Motions | |
03/12/2024 | 01/12/2024 | Deadline for the Joint Pretrial Order (the filing of a dispositive motion will suspend the joint pre-trial order deadline until 30 days after a decision on the motion or until otherwise ordered by the court) |
This date would be extended to February 11th, however, that is a sunday.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.