From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orellana v. Madden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 15, 2017
Case No. CV 16-2316 FMO (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. CV 16-2316 FMO (FFM)

02-15-2017

JUAN ORELLANA, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this action, the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and the objections to the Report. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo determination of the portions to which objections were directed.

IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered dismissing the Petition with prejudice. DATED: February 15, 2017

/s/_________

FERNANDO M. OLGUIN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Orellana v. Madden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 15, 2017
Case No. CV 16-2316 FMO (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2017)
Case details for

Orellana v. Madden

Case Details

Full title:JUAN ORELLANA, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 15, 2017

Citations

Case No. CV 16-2316 FMO (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2017)