From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orellana v. 386 Park S. LLC

Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 7, 2023
222 A.D.3d 438 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

Opinion

No. 1162 Index Nos. 157516/20 596090/20 595804/21 Case No. 2023-03018

12-07-2023

Augusto Orellana, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. 386 Park South LLC, Defendant-Respondent. 386 Park South LLC, Third Party Plaintiff,

Subin Associates, LLP, New York (Denise A. Rubin of counsel), for appellant. Romano Benowitz & Brochetelli, LLP, New York (Jonathan T. Uejio of counsel), for 386 Park South LLC, respondent. Black Marjieh & Sanford LLP, Elmsford (Leslie Luke of counsel), for Lawrence Exterior Restoration Corp., respondent.


Subin Associates, LLP, New York (Denise A. Rubin of counsel), for appellant.

Romano Benowitz & Brochetelli, LLP, New York (Jonathan T. Uejio of counsel), for 386 Park South LLC, respondent.

Black Marjieh & Sanford LLP, Elmsford (Leslie Luke of counsel), for Lawrence Exterior Restoration Corp., respondent.

Before: Webber, J.P., Scarpulla, Pitt-Burke, Rosado, O'Neill Levy, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie A. Stroth, J.), entered on May 22, 2023, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment on his Labor Law § 241(6) claim based on Industrial Code (12 NYCRR) § 23-1.7(d), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff allegedly slipped and fell on a slippery substance in a passageway while carrying a concrete bag on his shoulder. Plaintiff argued that he slipped on debris and a wet/greasy substance that was in the passageway that he was walking through, and the debris and the greasy/ wet substance on which he slipped was a "foreign substance" within the meaning of 12 NYCRR 23-1.7(d).

Plaintiff's affidavit, and the attached unauthenticated photographs, were insufficient to establish his prima facie entitlement to summary judgment. Plaintiff failed to establish that the source of the debris he fell on was not associated with the work that he or his coworkers were performing at the construction site (see Galazka v WFP One Liberty Plaza Co., LLC, 55 A.D.3d 789, 790 [2d Dept 2008], lv denied 12 N.Y.3d 709 [2009]).


Summaries of

Orellana v. 386 Park S. LLC

Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 7, 2023
222 A.D.3d 438 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
Case details for

Orellana v. 386 Park S. LLC

Case Details

Full title:Augusto Orellana, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. 386 Park South LLC…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 7, 2023

Citations

222 A.D.3d 438 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 6317
199 N.Y.S.3d 61