From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Reardon v. Wilson

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 17, 1927
138 A. 922 (N.J. 1927)

Opinion

Argued May 17, 1927 —

Decided October 17, 1927.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 4 N.J. Mis. R. 163.

For the appellant, Elmer W. Romine.

For the respondent, Charles A. Rathbun.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — PARKER, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

O'Reardon v. Wilson

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 17, 1927
138 A. 922 (N.J. 1927)
Case details for

O'Reardon v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS O'REARDON, APPELLANT, v. C. FRANKLIN WILSON, JUDGE, ETC., RESPONDENT

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 17, 1927

Citations

138 A. 922 (N.J. 1927)
138 A. 922

Citing Cases

State v. Longo

The Attorney-General and the several Prosecutors of the Pleas are constitutional officers (article 7, section…

Pub. Utility Commrs. v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.

Pamph. L. 1916, p. 560; Pamph. L. 1920, p. 549. This act of 1911 was considered in the case of O'Reardon v.…