From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ore v. Clarke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division
Aug 12, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17cv618 (E.D. Va. Aug. 12, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17cv618

08-12-2019

TRENTON JOSEPH ORE, Petitioner, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent.


FINAL ORDER

Before the Court is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and the Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 13. On April 3, 2015, the Petitioner was convicted of two counts of attempted robbery, two counts of malicious wounding, conspiracy to commit robbery, and three counts of use of a firearm in the commission of a felony after a jury trial in the Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk. The Petitioner was sentenced to a total term of forty-seven years in prison. In his petition, the pro se Petitioner challenges the constitutionality of this conviction and sentence.

The matter was referred for disposition to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(B)-(C), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), Local Civil Rule 72, and the April 2, 2002 Standing Order on Assignment of Certain Matters to United States Magistrate Judges. In a Report and Recommendation entered on February 27, 2019, ECF No. 17, and amended on April 25, 2019, ECF No. 18, the Magistrate Judge recommended the Motion to Dismiss be granted, and the petition be denied and dismissed with prejudice. The parties were advised of their right to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. Neither the Petitioner nor the Respondent filed objections with the Court.

Having reviewed the record and having heard no objection, the Court agrees with the Report and Recommendation on the grounds stated by the Magistrate Judge and ADOPTS and APPROVES the Amended Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 18, in its entirety as the Court's own opinion. Accordingly, the Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 13, is GRANTED, and the Petition, ECF No. 1, is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is ORDERED that judgment be entered in favor of the Respondent.

The Petitioner is hereby notified that he may appeal from the judgment entered pursuant to this Final Order by filing a written notice of appeal with the Clerk of the Court at the Walter E. Hoffman United States Courthouse, 600 Granby Street, Norfolk, Virginia 23510, within thirty (30) days from the date judgment is entered. Because the Petitioner has failed to demonstrate a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b)(1), the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 335-36 (2003).

The Clerk is DIRECTED to forward a copy of this Order to the Petitioner and counsel of record for the Respondent.

It is so ORDERED.

/s/_________

Mark S. Davis

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Norfolk, Virginia
August 12, 2019


Summaries of

Ore v. Clarke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division
Aug 12, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17cv618 (E.D. Va. Aug. 12, 2019)
Case details for

Ore v. Clarke

Case Details

Full title:TRENTON JOSEPH ORE, Petitioner, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division

Date published: Aug 12, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17cv618 (E.D. Va. Aug. 12, 2019)