From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ordunez v. Penitentiary of N.M.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Jul 31, 2013
CIV 12-0792 JCH/KBM (D.N.M. Jul. 31, 2013)

Opinion

CIV 12-0792 JCH/KBM

07-31-2013

ERNESTO RODRIGUEZ ORDUNEZ, Petitioner, v. PENITENTIARY OF NEW MEXICO, JAMES LOPEZ, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

PROPOSED FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

The Magistrate Judge filed her Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition on July 8, 2013 in this counseled habeas action. See Doc. 29. The proposed findings notify the parties of their ability to file objections and that failure to do so waives appellate review. To-date, counsel has not filed any objections and there is nothing in the record indicating that the proposed findings were not delivered.

Wherefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 29) is ADOPTED;
2. Per habeas counsel's position and/or the Court's findings above, the Second Amended Petition is considered amended to have dropped the sufficiency of the evidence claim and the unexhausted ineffectiveness claim designated by Petitioner as "J;"
3. The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 17) is GRANTED;
4. The § 2254 petition as amended above, is DENIED as without merit and dismissed with prejudice; and
5. A final order and order denying a certificate of appealability enter concurrently herewith.

_______________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ordunez v. Penitentiary of N.M.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Jul 31, 2013
CIV 12-0792 JCH/KBM (D.N.M. Jul. 31, 2013)
Case details for

Ordunez v. Penitentiary of N.M.

Case Details

Full title:ERNESTO RODRIGUEZ ORDUNEZ, Petitioner, v. PENITENTIARY OF NEW MEXICO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Jul 31, 2013

Citations

CIV 12-0792 JCH/KBM (D.N.M. Jul. 31, 2013)