From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ordonez v. State

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Oct 16, 2014
NO. 01-14-00180-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 16, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 01-14-00180-CR

10-16-2014

RICARDO ORDONEZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 351st District Court Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 1399320

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Ricardo Ordonez, pleaded guilty to the felony offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child under 14 years of age. The trial court found appellant guilty and, in accordance with the terms of appellant's plea bargain agreement with the State, sentenced appellant to 35 years' imprisonment. Acting pro se, appellant filed a notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.021(a)(1)(B)(i), (a)(2)(B) (West Supp. 2014).

A plea bargain case is one in which "a defendant's plea was guilty or nolo contendere and the punishment did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant." TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). In a plea bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court's permission to appeal. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02 (West 2006); TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

Here, the trial court's certification is included in the record on appeal. See id. The trial court's certification states that this is a plea bargain case and that the defendant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record supports the trial court's certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal. See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) ("A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.").

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Massengale, Brown, and Huddle. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).


Summaries of

Ordonez v. State

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Oct 16, 2014
NO. 01-14-00180-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 16, 2014)
Case details for

Ordonez v. State

Case Details

Full title:RICARDO ORDONEZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

Date published: Oct 16, 2014

Citations

NO. 01-14-00180-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 16, 2014)