Oranmore Enters., LLC v. Moawed Props., Llc.

1 Citing case

  1. Padula v. Freedom Mortg. Corp.

    Civil Action No. 19-cv-11666-ADB (D. Mass. Oct. 28, 2020)   Cited 1 times

    Defendant's position that its brief is sufficient is undercut further by the fact that Massachusetts state courts routinely require defendants to file separate fee requests after they prevail on § 15(c) motions. See, e.g., Oranmore Enters., LLC v. Moawed Props., LLC, 147 N.E.3d 1103 (Mass. App. Ct. 2020) (appellate court requiring motion for appeal-related fees to be filed within fourteen days); Rudnick v. QBJKL, LLC, 104 N.E.3d 683 (Mass. App. Ct. 2018) (same); Cabral v. Drouin, No. 17-misc-000616, 2017 WL 5179119 (Mass. Land Ct. Nov. 8, 2017) (trial court granting § 15(c) motion and requiring fee motion within nine days); DeNormandie v. JW Capital Partners, LLC, No. 1984-cv-02663, 2019 WL 6492592 (Mass. Super. Ct. Oct. 2, 2019) (twenty-one days); Donius v. Milligan, No. 16-misc-000277, 2016 WL 4272329 (Mass. Land Ct. Aug. 15, 2016) (twenty-three days); Danvers-DCH, Inc. v. Hill, No. 052974, 2007 WL 1302607 (Mass. Super. Ct. Mar. 5, 2007) (thirty-nine days).