From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orange v. LeBlanc

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT
Dec 21, 2011
2011 CA 1084 (La. Ct. App. Dec. 21, 2011)

Opinion

2011 CA 1084

12-21-2011

RANDELL ORANGE v. JAMES LEBLANC, SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS

Randell Orange Angle, LA Plaintiff-Appellant In Proper Person Jonathan R. Vining Baton Rouge, LA Attorney for Defendant-Appellee James LeBlanc, Secretary of the Department of Public Safety and Corrections, State of Louisiana


NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION


On Appeal from the 19th Judicial District Court

Parish of East Baton Rouge, Louisiana

Docket No. 584,172, Division "D"

Honorable Janice Clark, Judge Presiding

Randell Orange

Angle, LA

Plaintiff-Appellant

In Proper Person

Jonathan R. Vining

Baton Rouge, LA

Attorney for

Defendant-Appellee

James LeBlanc, Secretary of the

Department of Public Safety and

Corrections, State of Louisiana

BEFORE: CARTER, C.J., PARRO, AND HIGGINBOTHAM, JJ .

PARRO, J .

Randell Orange, an inmate in the custody of the Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections (DPSC), appeals a judgment dismissing his petition for judicial review of a DPSC ruling concerning a series of adverse disciplinary decisions resulting in lost good time credits. In his petition for judicial review, Orange sought monetary damages plus restoration of "over 2,850 days" of good time credits that he had lost in 39 separate disciplinary actions over a period of five years. It is well settled that only one disciplinary matter can be reviewed by the court in a single appeal. See Lightfoot v. Stalder. 97-2626 (La. App. 1st Cir. 12/28/98), 727 So.2d 553, 554-55. Moreover, under LSA-R.S. 15:1177(A), a claim for damages is specifically excluded from the matters that can be brought to the district court for judicial review. See also Pope v. State, 99-2559 (La. 6/29/01), 792 So.2d 713, 720-21.

The commissioner's screening report more than adequately addresses all of Orange's arguments and thoroughly explains the decision ultimately made by the district court in its judgment. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment and issue this summary disposition in accordance with Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2-16.2(A)(2), (4), (5), (6), and (7). All costs of this appeal are assessed to Randell Orange.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Orange v. LeBlanc

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT
Dec 21, 2011
2011 CA 1084 (La. Ct. App. Dec. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Orange v. LeBlanc

Case Details

Full title:RANDELL ORANGE v. JAMES LEBLANC, SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC…

Court:STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 21, 2011

Citations

2011 CA 1084 (La. Ct. App. Dec. 21, 2011)

Citing Cases

Holder v. LeBlanc

Id. at 555. The 19th JDC and this Court have routinely followed Lightfoot by similarly requiring inmates to…