From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orange v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Winchester
Aug 12, 2010
Case No. 4:09-cv-72 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 12, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 4:09-cv-72.

August 12, 2010


ORDER


United States Magistrate Judge Susan K. Lee filed her report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). [Court Doc. 16.] Neither party filed objections within the given 14 days.

After reviewing the record, the Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Lee's report and recommendation. The Court thus ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Lee's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations pursuant to § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b).

Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Court Doc. 8] is GRANTED. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Court Doc. 13] is DENIED. The Commissioner's denial of benefits is REVERSED and the instant action is REMANDED to the Commissioner. The Clerk shall close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Orange v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Winchester
Aug 12, 2010
Case No. 4:09-cv-72 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 12, 2010)
Case details for

Orange v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM A. ORANGE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Winchester

Date published: Aug 12, 2010

Citations

Case No. 4:09-cv-72 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 12, 2010)