From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oram v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
Aug 21, 2012
DA 12-0154 (Mont. Aug. 21, 2012)

Opinion

DA 12-0154

08-21-2012

GARY A. ORAM, JR., Petitioner and Appellant, v. STATE OF MONTANA, Respondent and Appellee.

For Appellant: Gary A. Oram, Jr. (Self-Represented), Missoula, Montana For Appellee: Steve Bullock, Montana Attorney General, C. Mark Fowler, Assistant Attorney General, Helena, Montana Jed Fitch, Beaverhead County Attorney, Dillon, Montana


APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, In and For the County of Beaverhead, Cause No. DC-11-13592 Honorable Loren Tucker, Presiding Judge COUNSEL OF RECORD:

For Appellant:

Gary A. Oram, Jr. (Self-Represented), Missoula, Montana

For Appellee:

Steve Bullock, Montana Attorney General, C. Mark Fowler, Assistant

Attorney General, Helena, Montana

Jed Fitch, Beaverhead County Attorney, Dillon, Montana Filed:

__________________________

Clerk
Justice James C. Nelson delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(d), Montana Supreme Court Internal Operating Rules, this case is decided by memorandum opinion and shall not be cited and does not serve as precedent. Its case title, cause number, and disposition shall be included in this Court's list of noncitable cases published in the Pacific Reporter and Montana Reports. ¶2 Gary A. Oram, Jr., a self-represented litigant, has appealed the District Court's February 27, 2012 denial of his petition for postconviction relief. The District Court determined that Oram's petition was not properly verified as required by § 46-21-103, MCA. The court dismissed Oram's petition without prejudice, thus leaving him the ability to amend his petition and provide a more appropriate record. Nevertheless, Oram appealed. Consequently, any further attempts at postconviction relief would be time barred. ¶3 We have determined to decide this case pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(d) of our Internal Operating Rules, which provides for noncitable memorandum opinions. Having reviewed the record and the arguments, we affirm the District Court's order.

JAMES C. NELSON We Concur: MIKE McGRATH
JIM RICE
MICHAEL E WHEAT
BRIAN MORRIS


Summaries of

Oram v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
Aug 21, 2012
DA 12-0154 (Mont. Aug. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Oram v. State

Case Details

Full title:GARY A. ORAM, JR., Petitioner and Appellant, v. STATE OF MONTANA…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Date published: Aug 21, 2012

Citations

DA 12-0154 (Mont. Aug. 21, 2012)