From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oram v. 6 B’S, Inc.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jul 3, 2018
913 N.W.2d 286 (Mich. 2018)

Opinion

SC: 157264 COA: 332925

07-03-2018

Shamama ORAM, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant-Appellant, and Zia Oram, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, and Victory Beer Wine & Liquor, LLC, Intervening Plaintiff-Appellant, v. 6 B’S, INC., d/b/a Victory Liquor & Foods, Defendant/Counterplaintiff/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and 16200, LLC, Defendant/Counterplaintiff/Third-Party Plaintiff, and Val Properties, LLC, John Yelda, Tom Dikho, and Warren St. Mary’s Investment, LLC, Defendants, and Wally Yelda and Haytham Dikho, Defendants-Appellees, and Latif Z. Oram, Third-Party Defendant.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 16, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

Oram v. 6 B’S, Inc.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jul 3, 2018
913 N.W.2d 286 (Mich. 2018)
Case details for

Oram v. 6 B’S, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Shamama ORAM, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant-Appellant, and Zia Oram…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Jul 3, 2018

Citations

913 N.W.2d 286 (Mich. 2018)